0.10/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.10/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zCgRIG2VNu true 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 1440 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 180 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 3 10:39:08 EDT 2023 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.13/0.34 % Running portfolio for 1440 s 0.13/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.13/0.34 % Number of cores: 8 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.13/0.35 % Running in HO mode 0.53/0.67 % Total configuration time : 828 0.53/0.67 % Estimated wc time : 1656 0.53/0.67 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0 0.53/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s 0.53/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s 0.54/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s 0.54/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s 0.54/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s 0.54/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s 0.54/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s 0.54/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_b.l.sh running for 90s 0.54/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s 0.54/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif.sh running for 56s 0.54/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_old_s4.sh running for 30s 0.57/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_lifting3.sh running for 30s 81.72/11.02 % Solved by lams/15_e_short1.sh. 81.72/11.02 % done 110 iterations in 10.212s 81.72/11.02 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p' 81.72/11.02 % SZS output start Refutation 81.72/11.02 thf(qML_i_type, type, qML_i: $tType). 81.72/11.02 thf(qML_mu_type, type, qML_mu: $tType). 81.72/11.02 thf(incons1389517216QML_mu_type, type, incons1389517216QML_mu: (qML_mu > 81.72/11.02 qML_i > $o) > 81.72/11.02 qML_mu > qML_i > $o). 81.72/11.02 thf(incons1905966852QML_mu_type, type, incons1905966852QML_mu: qML_mu > qML_i > $o). 81.72/11.02 thf(inconsistency_P_type, type, inconsistency_P: (qML_mu > qML_i > $o) > 81.72/11.02 qML_i > $o). 81.72/11.02 thf(qML_r_type, type, qML_r: qML_i > qML_i > $o). 81.72/11.02 thf(fact_0_A2, axiom, 81.72/11.02 (![W:qML_i,X:( qML_mu > qML_i > $o ),Xa:( qML_mu > qML_i > $o )]: 81.72/11.02 ( ( ( ![V:qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 ( ( qML_r @ W @ V ) => 81.72/11.02 ( ![Xb:qML_mu]: ( ( X @ Xb @ V ) => ( Xa @ Xb @ V ) ) ) ) ) & 81.72/11.02 ( inconsistency_P @ X @ W ) ) => 81.72/11.02 ( inconsistency_P @ Xa @ W ) ))). 81.72/11.02 thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain, 81.72/11.02 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : qML_mu > qML_i > $o]: 81.72/11.02 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : qML_mu > qML_i > $o]: 81.72/11.02 (((((((!!) @ (^[Y3 : qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 (((qML_r @ Y0 @ 81.72/11.02 Y3) => 81.72/11.02 (((!!) @ ( 81.72/11.02 ^[Y4 : qML_mu]: 81.72/11.02 (((Y1 @ Y4 @ 81.72/11.02 Y3) => 81.72/11.02 (Y2 @ Y4 @ 81.72/11.02 Y3))))))))))) & 81.72/11.02 (inconsistency_P @ Y1 @ Y0))) => 81.72/11.02 (inconsistency_P @ Y2 @ Y0))))))))))))), 81.72/11.02 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_0_A2])). 81.72/11.02 thf(fact_6_A4, axiom, 81.72/11.02 (![W:qML_i,X:( qML_mu > qML_i > $o )]: 81.72/11.02 ( ( inconsistency_P @ X @ W ) => 81.72/11.02 ( ![V2:qML_i]: ( ( qML_r @ W @ V2 ) => ( inconsistency_P @ X @ V2 ) ) ) ))). 81.72/11.02 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain, 81.72/11.02 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : qML_mu > qML_i > $o]: 81.72/11.02 (((inconsistency_P @ Y1 @ Y0) => 81.72/11.02 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 (((qML_r @ Y0 @ Y2) => 81.72/11.02 (inconsistency_P @ Y1 @ Y2))))))))))))))), 81.72/11.02 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_6_A4])). 81.72/11.02 thf(fact_3_A1a, axiom, 81.72/11.02 (![W:qML_i,X:( qML_mu > qML_i > $o )]: 81.72/11.02 ( ( inconsistency_P @ ( ^[Y:qML_mu,Z:qML_i]: ( ~( X @ Y @ Z ) ) ) @ W ) => 81.72/11.02 ( ~( inconsistency_P @ X @ W ) ) ))). 81.72/11.02 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain, 81.72/11.02 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : qML_mu > qML_i > $o]: 81.72/11.02 (((inconsistency_P @ 81.72/11.02 (^[Y2 : qML_mu,Y3 : qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 (((~) @ (Y1 @ Y2 @ Y3)))) @ 81.72/11.02 Y0) => (((~) @ (inconsistency_P @ Y1 @ Y0)))))))))))), 81.72/11.02 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_3_A1a])). 81.72/11.02 thf(fact_8_QML__S5_Osym, axiom, 81.72/11.02 (![X3:qML_i,Y2:qML_i]: ( ( qML_r @ X3 @ Y2 ) => ( qML_r @ Y2 @ X3 ) ))). 81.72/11.02 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain, 81.72/11.02 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 (((qML_r @ Y0 @ Y1) => (qML_r @ Y1 @ Y0)))))))))), 81.72/11.02 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_8_QML__S5_Osym])). 81.72/11.02 thf(fact_1_A5, axiom, 81.72/11.02 (![X_1:qML_i]: ( inconsistency_P @ incons1905966852QML_mu @ X_1 ))). 81.72/11.02 thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain, 81.72/11.02 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 (inconsistency_P @ incons1905966852QML_mu @ Y0))))), 81.72/11.02 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_1_A5])). 81.72/11.02 thf(fact_9_ref, axiom, (![X3:qML_i]: ( qML_r @ X3 @ X3 ))). 81.72/11.02 thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain, 81.72/11.02 ( (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : qML_i]: (qML_r @ Y0 @ Y0))))), 81.72/11.02 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_9_ref])). 81.72/11.02 thf(fact_10_NE__def, axiom, 81.72/11.02 (( incons1905966852QML_mu ) = 81.72/11.02 ( ^[X2:qML_mu,W2:qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 ( ![Y:( qML_mu > qML_i > $o )]: 81.72/11.02 ( ( incons1389517216QML_mu @ Y @ X2 @ W2 ) => 81.72/11.02 ( ![V3:qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 ( ( qML_r @ W2 @ V3 ) => ( ?[Z:qML_mu]: ( Y @ Z @ V3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ))). 81.72/11.02 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain, 81.72/11.02 (((incons1905966852QML_mu) 81.72/11.02 = ((^[Y0 : qML_mu,Y1 : qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : qML_mu > qML_i > $o]: 81.72/11.02 (((incons1389517216QML_mu @ Y2 @ Y0 @ Y1) => 81.72/11.02 (((!!) @ (^[Y3 : qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 (((qML_r @ Y1 @ Y3) => 81.72/11.02 (((??) @ (^[Y4 : qML_mu]: 81.72/11.02 (Y2 @ Y4 @ Y3)))))))))))))))))), 81.72/11.02 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_10_NE__def])). 81.72/11.02 thf(fact_11_ess__def, axiom, 81.72/11.02 (( incons1389517216QML_mu ) = 81.72/11.02 ( ^[Phi:( qML_mu > qML_i > $o ),X2:qML_mu,W2:qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 ( ![Y:( qML_mu > qML_i > $o )]: 81.72/11.02 ( ( Y @ X2 @ W2 ) => 81.72/11.02 ( ![V3:qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 ( ( qML_r @ W2 @ V3 ) => 81.72/11.02 ( ![Z:qML_mu]: ( ( Phi @ Z @ V3 ) => ( Y @ Z @ V3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ))). 81.72/11.02 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, 81.72/11.02 (((incons1389517216QML_mu) 81.72/11.02 = ((^[Y0 : qML_mu > qML_i > $o,Y1 : qML_mu,Y2 : qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 (((!!) @ (^[Y3 : qML_mu > qML_i > $o]: 81.72/11.02 (((Y3 @ Y1 @ Y2) => 81.72/11.02 (((!!) @ (^[Y4 : qML_i]: 81.72/11.02 (((qML_r @ Y2 @ Y4) => 81.72/11.02 (((!!) @ (^[Y5 : qML_mu]: 81.72/11.02 (((Y0 @ Y5 @ Y4) => 81.72/11.02 (Y3 @ Y5 @ Y4)))))))))))))))))))), 81.72/11.02 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [fact_11_ess__def])). 81.72/11.02 thf(zip_derived_cl3261, plain, ($false), 81.72/11.02 inference('eprover', [status(thm)], 81.72/11.02 [zip_derived_cl22, zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl8, 81.72/11.02 zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl16, 81.72/11.02 zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl3])). 81.72/11.02 81.72/11.02 % SZS output end Refutation 81.72/11.02 81.72/11.02 81.72/11.02 % Terminating... 81.72/11.11 % Runner terminated. 81.72/11.12 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting 81.72/11.12 EOF